MOT advisory “Prescribed areas prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive” — meaning and what to do

Last updated · OBDCode UK editorial

In plain English: the tester noted a seat belts or supplementary restraint systems item that was not a fail on that MOT. Act now.

This advisory means the tester found prescribed areas that was prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive — not judged bad enough to fail that recorded test, but noted for attention. It was recorded 60,776 times on UK Class 4 MOT certificates in 2025 (about #59 in this dataset).
Act now What to do about timing
60,776Times recorded in 2025
AdvisoryDid not fail that test

Can you drive with this?

Limit driving. Limit driving to short essential trips until a garage has assessed it. Avoid hard loads, towing, and long motorway runs.

Vehicle support. Never go under a car held only by a jack. Use axle stands on the handbook support points, on firm level ground, with wheel chocks. No roadside or slopes. Rock-test before you go under.

What the tester saw

MOT testers work from the DVSA inspection manual. For this item the manual wording is “The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired”. In plain English: the tester judged that wear or deterioration on the prescribed areas had not gone far enough to reject at that test. That is why it was recorded as an advisory rather than a failure. It is not a statement about the vehicle’s condition or legal status today.

If it worsens to the manual fail wording above, DVSA would class that defect as Major. That grade describes the fail threshold, not the recorded advisory.

Do you need to fix it?

An advisory did not affect that test’s result. It is the tester telling you what is likely to need attention, and how soon depends on the item.

  • Act now. Corrosion in a prescribed area can affect seat-belt anchorage strength — arrange a professional inspection now. Do not treat this as cosmetic body rust for the next MOT.
  • Can you DIY? We do not publish DIY repair or strip-down steps for this advisory. External look-over only; leave structural, brake hydraulic, fuel, steering, or restraint work to a qualified garage.
  • Buying a used car? Repeated advisories for the same item across several years of MOT history mean the owner has been ignoring it. Check the car’s full record with our free MOT history check.

What happened to other cars with this advisory

Of the 15,490 cars that passed their 2024 MOT with this advisory, 7.1% (95% CI 6.8–7.6) failed on that same item the following year — 73 times the rate for cars without it.

These figures are a statistical association from the national MOT extracts. They are not a prediction about this car, and we have not inspected it.

Their rate of failing a 2025 MOT for any reason was 29.8% (95% CI 29.1–30.5), against 18.2% (95% CI 18.2–18.2) for cars that passed without this advisory.

The same 15,490 cars were 19.1 percentage points more likely not to be tested again in 2025 (26.4% (95% CI 25.7–27.1) versus 7.3% (95% CI 7.3–7.3) for cars without the advisory). The extracts do not record scrappage; a missing later test is the public signal that the vehicle was not presented.

The median car in this cohort was 18.0 years old with 110,790 miles at the 2024 test.

By age at the 2024 test

Scroll horizontally to read every age column.

AgeCarsSame-item failNot tested again
8–12 years 662 6.0% (95% CI 4.5–8.1) 11.3% (95% CI 9.1–14.0)
12–16 years 2,823 7.3% (95% CI 6.4–8.4) 19.4% (95% CI 18.0–20.9)
16 years and over 11,701 7.2% (95% CI 6.7–7.7) 29.0% (95% CI 28.2–29.8)

By mileage at the 2024 test

Scroll horizontally to read every mileage column.

MileageCarsSame-item failNot tested again
Under 40,000 miles 605 8.3% (95% CI 6.3–10.7) 19.0% (95% CI 16.1–22.3)
40,000–80,000 miles 3,071 7.7% (95% CI 6.8–8.6) 16.9% (95% CI 15.6–18.3)
80,000–120,000 miles 5,011 7.5% (95% CI 6.8–8.3) 23.6% (95% CI 22.4–24.8)
120,000 miles and over 6,533 6.5% (95% CI 6.0–7.2) 33.7% (95% CI 32.6–34.8)

Models with the highest same-item fail rate

Among models with enough cars in this cohort (at least 200 each), these had the highest rate of failing on the same item in 2025. Showing 8 of 17 qualifying models.

Scroll horizontally to read every model column.

#Make and modelCarsSame-item failNot tested again
1 Citroen Xsara 201 13.9% (95% CI 9.8–19.4) 30.8% (95% CI 24.9–37.5)
2 Volkswagen Polo 399 12.5% (95% CI 9.6–16.1) 18.5% (95% CI 15.0–22.7)
3 Ford Ka 222 11.7% (95% CI 8.1–16.6) 23.9% (95% CI 18.7–29.9)
4 Ford Transit Connect 375 10.9% (95% CI 8.2–14.5) 27.5% (95% CI 23.2–32.2)
5 Toyota Aygo 205 10.7% (95% CI 7.2–15.7) 16.1% (95% CI 11.7–21.7)
6 Honda Jazz 317 9.5% (95% CI 6.7–13.2) 18.3% (95% CI 14.4–22.9)
7 Mazda Mx-5 422 8.5% (95% CI 6.2–11.6) 21.8% (95% CI 18.1–26.0)
8 Ford Fiesta 658 8.2% (95% CI 6.3–10.6) 22.2% (95% CI 19.2–25.5)

A robustness re-run on the 7,473 cars tested in January–June 2024 only — so the next annual test almost always falls inside 2025 — found a same-item fail rate of 7.5% (95% CI 6.9–8.1) and a not-retested gap of +18.4 points. A December 2024 test may not be due until 2026, which can make a car look as if it vanished; the first-half window removes most of that censoring.

Same wording as a fail

Of the 58,367 cars that failed on this line in 2024, 5.5% (95% CI 5.4–5.7) failed on it again in 2025 — 36 times the rate for cars that did not fail on this item, and 37.7% (95% CI 37.3–38.1) of those 58,367 cars that failed were not tested again. Did this failure stay fixed?

Follow-up uses the DVSA vehicle_id, which is stable across annual releases, so the same physical car is compared from its 2024 test to its 2025 test. Browse the MOT prognosis registry. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT tests and results, 2024 and 2025 extracts (Class 4). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Related seat belts and supplementary restraint systems advisories

Before you agree to the work

A fault or an advisory is a quote waiting to happen. These pages set out what a garage has to tell you, what a comparable written quote should include, and what you can do if the bill is not what you agreed.

Frequency: DVSA Anonymised MOT tests and results, 2025 extract (Class 4). Wording follows the DVSA inspection manual. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.